HOME PAGE

Buddhist Psychotherapy is becoming more accepted and desired by people seeking mental health treatment. However it is noteworthy that Buddhist Psychotherapy is not just intended for Buddhists. Even Buddha never referred to himself as a Buddhist, nor even purported to practice Buddhism! In any event, one of the many gems arising from the past 2500 year history of Buddhist Eastern Psychology is Mindfulness Meditation.

One of the commonly acceptable definitions of Mindfulness Meditation to date is that it is a training of mind through the deliberate paying of attention non-judgementally in the present moment. Sound simple? It is! But it's not easy, as I and many of my clients attest. However the rewards are profound, and the practice has enormous benefits for psychotherapy. Some of the skills mindfulness therapy renders:

*Flexibility of awareness *Reduced reactivity or rumination *Cognitive diffusion (ability to observe thoughts without getting hooked into them) *Calm stability of mind *Decreased repression (only when mindfulness is not used defensively!)

Buddhist Psychology has made a large claim; that there is a way out of suffering. That you do not need to be a Buddhist or believe in anything in particular to benefit from the profound self observation practices. This is in contrast to traditional counselling and psychotherapy, which really is barely 100 years old, since Freud, then Lacan, etc. Western geniuses of psychoanalysis, no doubt. But Eastern and Western perspectives vary markedly on many levels. First off, the aims are different. As Freud said the aim of psychoanalysis is to turn neurotic suffering into ordinary human misery. Buddha's aim was perhaps a tad more grand, the cessation of suffering.

In my view as a training psychoanalyst and Buddhist Psychotherapist I can really get the many strengths and limitations of both models when applied clinically. Generally Eastern models like Buddhist Psychotherapy pay little or no attention to the intrapsychic conflicts, or the major influence that repressed sexual neuroses and early childhood experiences have upon adult psychological functioning. On the other hand Western psychoanalysis (and Psychology for that matter) tend to miss the subtle benefits that mindfulness meditation can afford, such as less reactivity and repression. Clearly, both approaches can complement each other.

Both approaches probably lead to decreased narcissism, greater psychological and spiritual (according to the individual’s version of what that means) maturity. As it has been said before, we have to become someone before we can realise that we are inherently no one. Sound grim? Not according to many sages who claim deep nirvana can arise through a release of attachment to a fixed notion of an essential self or I. But that’s further down the track for many of us! For most suffering individuals who visit Buddhist psychotherapists, the first aim is to help them establish a mindfulness practice. At that point if I detect a likely transference (and working relationship) and capacity for insight and reflection I may recommend psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Psychoanalysis and mindfulness meditation has not to my knowledge ever been researched in tandem, although both are validated as highly efficacious psychological modalities. In my clinical experience, when combining Mindfulness meditation with psychoanalytic psychotherapy, the changes and insights people gain can be very profound.

First off. Have you ever wondered, what is the difference between psychology and psychotherapy? The differences are huge. They are miles apart.

We need to define what is psychology and psychotherapy. Let us limit our thinking to the clinical setting, for our purposes here, where both terms are broad and have varying definitions.

Psychology comprises certain psychologists who have been trying to position their profession within the domain of science for some time, close to that of medicine. One output of this seems to me an ever popular, tempting but potentially insidious love affair with fitting people into psychological categories. There is a label for almost everything abnormal or pathological these days. There is no label for normal or healthy. Why? Maybe because the label itself, is part of the disease... the disease which alienates one even further from discovering their true self, their own desires.

If you think of psychological distress in the same way a doctor traditionally treats physical symptoms we miss the crucial uniqueness of the individual, how they create suffering and how they, and only they (with the help of a psychotherapist) can use the key (in their unconscious) to come out of their suffering.

Further, there is no current training requirement for a psychologist to undertake their own personal therapy. A psychoanalyst or psychoanalytic psychotherapist must untertake adequate internsive personal therapy, usually of a minimum of 3-4 years of twice weekly therapy. Who knows what unconscious issues a therapist lacking in the sort of insights an intensive psychotherapy affords might bring to sessions with their patients without even realising. As with any couple relationship, both parties bring their own histories and unconscious agendas to the dynamic despite intentionality. It is arguable that a psychotherapist who has undertaken adequate personal therapy would be more likely to at least keep more of their unconscious agendas that may not be in the best interests of their patients at bay.

It’s almost assumed that if you have a label, 12 short psychology sessions will cure you of your symptoms and make you “functional”. Functional according to whom and whose desires are of course never elucidated. A quick fix is often the lazy way out. Just another fantasy.

When I speak of psychotherapy here, I am referring to psychoanalytic psychotherapy. This practice has nothing to do with fitting people into categories of disease, or giving people new meanings for their symptoms, because it is often meaning itself which form the core of their illness. We are ill because of meaning.

One difference we can propose is that psychology often looks at categorising people into various definitions of symptoms based upon and in comparison to different social norms. Many patients are drawn to this because it supposedly gives some perceived comfort with “knowing” what is wrong.

Psychotherapy is all about the individual.

Freud started thinking of psychoanalysis as science too but quickly abandoned the fruitless attempt to make a science out of something that is not.

There is something seductive about meaning making and labels. I lose count of how many people I see who say things like “I’m anorgasmic”, “I have generalised anxiety disorder”, “I have depression”. These identity descriptions and many others like them say nothing to me about the individual person sitting in front of me when I do psychotherapy. I am far more interested in hearing what they have to say, and listening for the trail of the repressed.

The psychotherapy journey is in depth and highly individual.

More often people begin psychotherapy or counselling with a host of unconscious conflicts, meanings (identity descriptions) and desires which don’t even belong to them. Part of psychotherapy involves the in depth process of figuring out who we are, and what we really want in our lives. If we as counsellors, social workers, psychologists, psychotherapists or whatever, think of our patients too theoretically we are likely to read our theiries into the person, alienating them further, and missing crucial things they are actually saying (and not saying). Categories may serve a temporary relief for anxiety, but that's harldy what anyone who can read without moving their lips would call living.

Those able and brave enough to undertake intensive psychotherapy frequently report deeper and lasting insights into themselves far beyond what any seductive label or so called focussed psychological treatment, offers the individual.

These ideas are based on my experience and are my own views in the present time and space of March 2011. They may not always be my opinions, nor were they always.

First off. Have you ever wondered, what is the difference between psychology and psychotherapy? The differences are huge. They are miles apart.

We need to define what is psychology and psychotherapy. Let us limit our thinking to the clinical setting, for our purposes here, where both terms are broad and have varying definitions.

Psychology comprises certain psychologists who have been trying to position their profession within the domain of science for some time, close to that of medicine. One output of this seems to me an ever popular, tempting but potentially insidious love affair with fitting people into psychological categories. There is a label for almost everything abnormal or pathological these days. There is no label for normal or healthy. Why? Maybe because the label itself, is part of the disease... the disease which alienates one even further from discovering their true self, their own desires.

If you think of psychological distress in the same way a doctor traditionally treats physical symptoms we miss the crucial uniqueness of the individual, how they create suffering and how they, and only they (with the help of a psychotherapist) can use the key (in their unconscious) to come out of their suffering.

Further, there is no current training requirement for a psychologist to undertake their own personal therapy. A psychoanalyst or psychoanalytic psychotherapist must untertake adequate internsive personal therapy, usually of a minimum of 3-4 years of twice weekly therapy. Who knows what unconscious issues a therapist lacking in the sort of insights an intensive psychotherapy affords might bring to sessions with their patients without even realising. As with any couple relationship, both parties bring their own histories and unconscious agendas to the dynamic despite intentionality. It is arguable that a psychotherapist who has undertaken adequate personal therapy would be more likely to at least keep more of their unconscious agendas that may not be in the best interests of their patients at bay.

It’s almost assumed that if you have a label, 12 short psychology sessions will cure you of your symptoms and make you “functional”. Functional according to whom and whose desires are of course never elucidated. A quick fix is often the lazy way out. Just another fantasy.

When I speak of psychotherapy here, I am referring to psychoanalytic psychotherapy. This practice has nothing to do with fitting people into categories of disease, or giving people new meanings for their symptoms, because it is often meaning itself which form the core of their illness. We are ill because of meaning.

One difference we can propose is that psychology often looks at categorising people into various definitions of symptoms based upon and in comparison to different social norms. Many patients are drawn to this because it supposedly gives some perceived comfort with “knowing” what is wrong.

Psychotherapy is all about the individual.

Freud started thinking of psychoanalysis as science too but quickly abandoned the fruitless attempt to make a science out of something that is not.

There is something seductive about meaning making and labels. I lose count of how many people I see who say things like “I’m anorgasmic”, “I have generalised anxiety disorder”, “I have depression”. These identity descriptions and many others like them say nothing to me about the individual person sitting in front of me when I do psychotherapy. I am far more interested in hearing what they have to say, and listening for the trail of the repressed.

The psychotherapy journey is in depth and highly individual.

More often people begin psychotherapy or counselling with a host of unconscious conflicts, meanings (identity descriptions) and desires which don’t even belong to them. Part of psychotherapy involves the in depth process of figuring out who we are, and what we really want in our lives. If we as counsellors, social workers, psychologists, psychotherapists or whatever, think of our patients too theoretically we are likely to read our theiries into the person, alienating them further, and missing crucial things they are actually saying (and not saying). Categories may serve a temporary relief for anxiety, but that's harldy what anyone who can read without moving their lips would call living.

Those able and brave enough to undertake intensive psychotherapy frequently report deeper and lasting insights into themselves far beyond what any seductive label or so called focussed psychological treatment, offers the individual.

These ideas are based on my experience and are my own views in the present time and space of March 2011. They may not always be my opinions, nor were they always.